HomeНаука и техникаRelated VideosMore From: Newsy Science

Scientist Says New Research Proves 'Dogs are People Too'

70 ratings | 5171 views
New research on dogs' brains has one neuroscientist and his team saying that dogs are capable of love and have emotions very similar to humans.
Html code for embedding videos on your blog
Text Comments (26)
F.E.A.R NOT LIONS (3 years ago)
That's not amazing that's normal for me 😌😃😃😃😃😃
William Flogaus (4 years ago)
since they are human then they need to be held responsible for ny crime they commit.  I've seen them kill animals so they should be fined or go to jail.
An-akwardperson (4 months ago)
William Flogaus - than people should be put in jail or get death penalty for what they do to dogs too
VegieBBr (4 years ago)
many animals have this.... people are stupid to think otherwise.... but go ahead eat beef ... might as well eat cats and dogs...
Avvido (4 years ago)
Lovely Gentlemann (4 years ago)
The title sounds like an onion video lol
Avvido (4 years ago)
I haven't made anything up, it's what you've implied. Furthermore I don't care whether you feel superior to me, you're just continuing to prove my point.
You Don't Say? (4 years ago)
You always demonstrate your arrogance and incompetence with your replies. "you think you're intelligent because you watch this show" You just made this up, so evidently you're also a liar. There was nothing patronizing about my answer to your question as there was no conveying of any sense of superiority. However, having seen what kind of person you are, I do in fact think I am superior to you. But this is hardly a "high-horse", as you are the one stooping to such pathetic depths of insecurity.
Avvido (4 years ago)
NewsyScience only reports on topics that have already been reported on, they are like the boring version of SourceFed. They've also done some pretty dumb reports as well such as a report on the existence of Bigfoot. The moronic thing is, is that you think you're intelligent because you watch this show. You're a jackass for patronizing me with your first comment and then getting atop your high-horse by speaking to me like you're a dictionary. You're just arrogant.
You Don't Say? (4 years ago)
You asked me what I meant by a "generalized word" and I gave you the best answer I could in the allotted 500 characters that YouTube allows. I didnt "choose to talk like I'm reading out of a dictionary". I chose to talk like I'm talking to somebody who might understand intermediate English vocabulary, since this is a "NewsyScience" video and not a "ShaneDawson" video. Anybody who criticizes another for showing the ability to speak fluently and coherently is definitely a moron. So you're a moron.
Avvido (4 years ago)
I'm not a moron, I just think you could have summarized it without having to try and show off your articulateness. "Humans" generalizes our species and "People" generalizes Humans, it's as simple as that. I can be articulate but I choose not to talk to people like I'm reading out of a dictionary.
You Don't Say? (4 years ago)
Sorry I didn't realize you were a moron otherwise I wouldn't have bothered replying.
Avvido (4 years ago)
You talk a lot of shit don't you?
You Don't Say? (4 years ago)
a generalized word only supplies a certain useful amount of specificity, from which we can extrapolate ourselves any further details or subsets of the term. "humans" refers specifically to homosapiens, but not to the gender, culture, race, size, etc. So it is already "generalized", hence why I say it's "a funny concept" to have the word "people" to generalize it. The common use of "people" is really just "humans", but I think it makes more sense to further generalize it 'as any sentient being'.
Avvido (4 years ago)
What do you mean by a generalized word?
Jewbacca Goldsburg (4 years ago)
That writer for the National Review must be a Christian or some kind of religious retard still believing that their "God" created us in his or her image. That humans were created with love and emotions and that animals cant have that. This just shows that we are all part of this universe. We are related to everything. That evolution is true. If humans are capable of emotions, why cant other animals. After all, we are animals too.
You Don't Say? (4 years ago)
What a funny concept, a word to generalize an already generalized word.
Danarogon (4 years ago)
They never said Dogs are human. They said dogs are "people" as in they have intelligence and feelings much like how "people" do.
Mikael Nilsson (4 years ago)
Cats are still smarter then Dogs ^^ !!
Avvido (4 years ago)
People is just a word to generalize humans.
The80sKickAss (4 years ago)
...this is absurd. First corporations are people, now dogs are people. What's next plants and microbes? Our definition of a person is getting more and more vague as time goes on. The only people on this planet, currently, are humans as far as I'm concerned. When animals become philosophers and engineers then we can talk about personhood. They are a long way off at this point.
cruciferousvegetable (4 years ago)
I'm not a dog person. Having a dog is like sharing a living space with a goat or a chicken. They stink and they are dirty. They should do a study on cats. It would find that humans are the pet and the cat is the master. Cats are cleaner than humans.
Grahf0 (4 years ago)
I'm a dog and I like socks. I like socks, I'm a dog.
onjoFilms (4 years ago)
Dogs are the best people.
miguelboxer177 (4 years ago)
I think I'm a dog
You Don't Say? (4 years ago)
Dogs are people. Dogs are not human. Humans are people but people are not necessarily human. It's that simple. Cows and pigs are people, too. Soylent green is people.

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.